SHS3 Additional Mathematics · Semester 1, Week 1

Applications of Algebra

Full lesson notes coming

Notes for this lesson are being prepared. The curriculum details below are complete and ready to use for your planning.

Curriculum details

Strand
Modelling with Algebra (Strand 1)
Sub-strand
Applications of Algebra (1.2)
Content standard
3.1.2.CS.1 - Appreciate the concepts of logic and apply the concept to draw valid conclusions and deductions from arguments. 3.1.2.LO.1 Construct compound statements and truth tables using connectives. 3.1.2.LO.2 Apply linear transformation in: finding images of points and object points. finding reflections and rotations of points and plane figures.
Indicator
3.1.2.LI.2 - Draw implications from given statements and their converses.
Suggested placement
Semester 1, Week 1 (Week 1 of the year)

Our suggestion, laid out in curriculum order across three terms of twelve weeks. NaCCA does not fix the week, so follow your school's scheme of learning.

Curriculum reference
NaCCA curriculum document, p. 440

Exemplars (from the NaCCA curriculum)

Talk for Learning, Think-Pair-Share, building on what others say.
Learning Experience: Learners, in pairs, discuss statements and draw implications from those statements.
Activity 1: Implicative statements Learners in groups discuss the concept of implications.
Implication: Consider the following statements;
- If it is a dog, then it is an animal with four legs.
- If two triangles are congruent, then the two triangles are similar.
- If a = b, then a 2 = b 2 .
- If he has passed the examination, then he is promoted.
Each of these sentences consists of two clauses - the "if clause" and the "then clause". Each of the two clauses is a statement in itself. Let us consider the "if clause" as statement P and the "then clause" as statement Q. It is observed that in each case, if statement P is true, then it implies that statement Q is also true. This is expressed as P implies Q, symbolically P ⇒ Q Sentences of the type P ⇒ Q are referred to as Implication.
Statements 1, 2 and 3 may appear as follows:
- It is a dog ⇒ It is an animal with 4 legs
- Two triangles are congruent ⇒ Two triangles are similar
- a = b, ⇒a 2 = b 2
Note that the arrow "⇒" always points to the "then clause".
Example 1: Which implications are true or false;
- x 2 > 4, then x > 2
- If a number is a perfect square, then it is positive
Solution
- False, (-3) 2 > 4, (But -3 < 2)
- True
Converse of an Implication For all implications, the arrow "⇒" always points at the "then clause", as shown in the following implications:
- It is a dog⇒ It is an animal with 4 legs.
- Two triangles are congruent ⇒ Two triangles are similar.
- a = b, ⇒a 2 = b 2
If the arrow is reversed like this "⇐", the implications appear as follows:
It is a dog ⇐ It is an animal with four legs.
Two triangles are congruent ⇐ Two triangles are similar. a = b⇐a 2 = b 2 Implications a, b and c are the respective converses of the implications 1, 2 and 3.
For converse (1);
- It is a dog ⇐ It has four legs
This means that "if it has four legs, then it is a dog."
The implication is false because not only dogs have four legs. Since this implication is not true, it is written as:
It is a dog ⇐ It has four legs.
Activity 2: The Chain Rule of Implication
Learners in groups discuss the chain rule of implications.
Example 1 Consider the statements that P, Q and R are defined by: P: x > 7, Q : x > 5, R : x > 3 and the implications P ⇒Q : x > 7 ⇒x > 5 Q ⇒R : x > 5 ⇒ x > 3
This can be represented in a venn diagram as shown below: ∪ = {numbers} A = {numbers > 7} B = {numbers > 5} C = {numbers > 3}
Nested sets A, B and C drawn as concentric regions inside universal set U.
Nested sets A, B and C drawn as concentric regions inside universal set U.
It is observed that A ⊂ B ⊂ C ⇒ A ⊂ C. Thus, if a number is greater 7, then it is also greater than 3.
Generally, if P ⇒ Q and Q ⇒ R, the conclusively, P ⇒ R. This is called the chain rule of implication, written as P ⇒ Q ⇒ R.
Teaching and Learning Resources:
- SHS Curriculum, Graph boards, mathematical set, ICT tools
Assessment (3.1.2.AS.2). The document marks these depth-of-knowledge levels for this indicator: Level 3 Strategic reasoning.