SHS1 Engineering · Semester 1, Week 3

Engineering in Society

Lesson notes

Learning Objectives

Indicator: 1.1.1.LI.3 - Establishing the interdependencies across the engineering disciplines.

By the end of the lesson, learners can:

  1. Identify at least three engineering disciplines that must work together to complete a given engineering project.
  2. Explain, with reasons, why no single engineering discipline can independently execute a complex project.
  3. Describe the specific roles that different engineering professionals play within a multi-disciplinary project team.
  4. Map the sequence of tasks in a project and state which discipline leads at each stage and which disciplines support it.
  5. Justify, using examples from Ghana, the claim that successful engineering projects depend on inter-disciplinary collaboration.

Sign in with your phone number to read the full note and download the GES plan - free.

Sign in with phone number

Curriculum details

Strand
Engineering Practice (Strand 1)
Sub-strand
Engineering in Society (1.1)
Content standard
1.1.1.CS.1 - Demonstrate an understanding of the place of engineering in societal development. 1.1.1.LO.1 Identify engineering footprints in learners' communities. 1.1.1.LO.2 Explain the role of professionals in the engineering disciplines.
Indicator
1.1.1.LI.3 - Establishing the interdependencies across the engineering disciplines.
Suggested placement
Semester 1, Week 3 (Week 3 of the year)

Our suggestion, laid out in curriculum order across three terms of twelve weeks. NaCCA does not fix the week, so follow your school's scheme of learning.

Curriculum reference
NaCCA curriculum document, p. 25

Exemplars (from the NaCCA curriculum)

Collaborative Learning: Learners sit in groups, with each group assigned an engineering project, to discuss the engineering disciplines required to execute the project, as well as the specific roles each will play. A representative of each group should present their work. Building on What Others say: Other groups add to the content presented by each group in a respectful manner. Groups should be encouraged to tolerate others' views.

Assessment (1.1.1.AS.3). The document marks these depth-of-knowledge levels for this indicator: Level 3 Strategic reasoning.

Teaching and Learning Resources:
- Projector
- Laptop and videos on engineering works